Book a consultation

Insight

Robotic inspection in New Zealand: substations, water assets and ports

Legged robots fit best on routine, repeatable inspection rounds inside the fence at substations, treatment plants and industrial sites, where they carry cameras, thermal imagers and acoustic sensors along the same route each time and send the results to engineers. New Zealand asset owners already use drones on lines and port assets and underwater vehicles at hydro stations; ground robots apply the same idea to switchyards and plant rooms. Under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, permits, decisions and site safety stay with the asset owner.

By Robotx · 8 min read

Key takeaways

  • New Zealand asset owners already inspect remotely, with drones on transmission and distribution lines, drones at Lyttelton Port and an underwater vehicle at a hydro station.
  • Legged robots suit repeatable rounds over gravel, kerbs, stairs and trench covers inside substations and plant, where drones and wheeled robots struggle.
  • HSWA asks you to eliminate a risk before you minimise it. Sending a robot instead of a person is an elimination option worth testing for remote, energised or confined areas.
  • Robot routes should respect the same safe distances as people under NZECP 34:2001 and your network's own safety rules.
  • The value depends on getting robot findings into your asset management system against the right asset IDs.
  • Most general-purpose quadrupeds are not certified for explosive atmospheres. Hazardous areas need certified equipment.

Inspection rounds at a zone substation, a pump station or a port switchroom are a good match for robots on paper: the same route, the same equipment and the same readings, repeated on a schedule. In practice the robot also has to cross a wet gravel yard, send its data somewhere useful, stay inside your permit system and keep working through a southerly.

What are New Zealand asset owners already doing?

Most published New Zealand examples of remote inspection use drones or underwater vehicles, alongside an earlier ground robot trial. These are the asset owners’ own programmes.

  • Transpower, ground robots: in July 2018 Transpower began a month-long pilot at Albany Substation with two tracked robots developed with Massey University. They carried cameras, microphones, zoom and thermal imaging. Transpower said 25 of its 174 substations were remote from its core workforce, so a callout could take more than 90 minutes to answer, and described the robots as potential “eyes on the ground”.
  • Transpower, drones on the grid: in January 2019 Transpower said its service provider was testing drones that fly pre-programmed routes between towers, inspect several conductors in one pass and reduce the need for helicopter flights. Images were being used to develop software that classifies defects.
  • Lines companies: MainPower began testing drones in 2023 for visual and thermal checks of lines, poles and transformers, flown within line of sight under Civil Aviation Rule Part 101, with field operators trained with help from Orion. In March 2025 Aurora Energy had Northpower run a combined drone and ground-based acoustic inspection of 899 poles between Alexandra and Roxburgh, with the drone camera kept pointing down so it would not capture buildings or windows.
  • Ports: in July 2026 Lyttelton Port Company announced a national safety award for using drones to remove people from work at height. Uses include container roof inspections, coal stockpile monitoring, terminal pavement inspections and seawall surveys, with thousands of container roof inspections done by drone at its MidlandPort site in Rolleston.
  • Hydro generation: in April 2025 Meridian Energy said it was trialling an underwater remotely operated vehicle at Benmore Power Station to inspect canals, dams and spillways. The aim is to rely less on divers and on dewatering, which can keep generating units out of service for days.

Where do legged robots fit?

Drones suit lines, towers, roofs and stockpiles. Inside the fence, the work is different. Substations have gravel yards, kerbs, cable trench covers and steps into control buildings, and plant rooms have stairs, grating and tight aisles. Legged robots can step over that ground, carry several sensors at once and repeat a route precisely, which makes readings comparable over time.

Overseas, the published examples are mostly pilots. In early 2024 Avangrid’s United Illuminating business in Connecticut piloted a legged robot at two substations to read analogue gauges, take thermal images of transformer and breaker phases and, optionally, sense acoustic anomalies. It was first driven by an on-site operator with a tablet, with remote operation in development. DEEP Robotics reports substation deployments where quadrupeds with visible-light and thermal cameras and lidar read instruments and check equipment temperatures; those results are published by the manufacturer.

What can a legged robot inspect?

Inspection task What the robot collects What still needs a person
Visual rounds Zoomed images of equipment, oil levels, doors and fences, compared with a baseline Judging unfamiliar defects and deciding on action
Thermal survey Temperatures on connections, bushings and breaker phases, compared across phases Interpretation, allowing for load and sun
Gauge reading Analogue pressure, temperature, level and density gauges read by computer vision Confirming out-of-range readings and faulty gauges
Acoustic sensing Imaged air or gas leaks and abnormal sound or vibration Diagnosis and follow-up testing
Security patrol Fence lines, gates, building doors and signs of intrusion Response to breaches and police liaison
Water and wastewater plant Pump bearings, valve positions, leaks and dosing areas, where sensors are fitted Process decisions and confined space entry

Boston Dynamics, for example, describes its inspection robot reading gauges with a pan-tilt-zoom camera, finding hot spots with a thermal camera and using acoustic imagers to locate air leaks.

How do HSWA and WorkSafe guidance apply?

Under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, a PCBU must eliminate risks to health and safety so far as is reasonably practicable, and minimise them where elimination is not reasonably practicable. A robot that does a routine round in an energised yard, or looks inside a tank, can be part of that elimination step. WorkSafe’s confined spaces guidance makes the same point plainly: always check first whether the work can be done with equipment from outside, and do not go in if you do not have to.

The robot is also plant under HSWA, which brings its own risks: people working near a moving machine, charging, and recovery when it stops somewhere awkward. Record those in your risk assessment and engage the workers who will work alongside it, as the Act requires. Where a contractor, the asset owner and the equipment supplier all have duties for the same work, they need to work together on them.

HSWA is changing. Amendments received Royal Assent on 9 July 2026, and most provisions come into force on 1 April 2027. They concentrate duties on critical risks, those likely to cause death or serious harm. Work near high voltage and in confined spaces is likely to fall in that group, so check how the amended duties apply to your rounds when you plan a deployment.

Safe distances and hazardous areas

Near high-voltage equipment, the robot is another object moving through the yard. NZECP 34:2001, the mandatory code of practice for electrical safe distances, sets minimum approach distances for people near exposed live parts, and its distances also guide the design of electrical works within substations. Plan routes so the robot, and any mast or payload it carries, stays outside the distances your network applies to people, under the same access rules.

Classified explosive atmospheres, such as parts of some fuel, gas and chemical sites, are a separate question. The Electricity (Safety) Regulations 2010 call up parts of the AS/NZS 60079 series for electrical installations in hazardous areas, and equipment used in a zone needs to be certified for it. ANYbotics announced an IECEx and ATEX Zone 1 certified legged robot in 2022, but most general-purpose quadrupeds are not certified for explosive atmospheres. Confirm certification before any robot enters a classified area.

How does it connect to asset management?

Robot data is only useful if it reaches the people and systems that plan maintenance. Map each inspection point on the robot’s route to an asset ID in your enterprise asset management or maintenance system. Set thresholds so readings outside limits raise a notification or work request for an engineer to review, rather than sitting in a separate dashboard. Where the platform supports it, fleet software can export results through standard interfaces.

Decide early who reviews robot findings, how quickly, and how false alarms are tuned out. Keep images and readings long enough to show trends.

Connectivity and cyber security

Many substations and pump stations sit in rural areas with limited mobile coverage, and switchyards are harsh radio environments. Plan for a private network, a local mesh, or robots that store results and upload on return to the dock. Remote control of a robot inside a critical site is an operational technology question. Keep the robot on a segregated network, control supplier remote access, and cover it in your existing OT security and supply chain reviews.

Will it cope with New Zealand site conditions?

Check each item against your wettest, windiest and most exposed sites:

  • IP rating of the robot, each payload and the dock, under IEC 60529 (first digit for dust, second for water)
  • Operating temperature range, including charging, against winter frosts and snow at inland and alpine sites
  • Salt spray and corrosion at coastal substations, ports and treatment plants
  • Wind, driving rain and mud on camera and lidar windows, and a cleaning routine for them
  • Terrain, such as loose gravel, slopes, drainage channels and stock or wildlife near rural yards

Who stays in control?

A robot should enter a substation or plant under the same access and permit arrangements as any other entry, with an authorised person responsible for each mission. The robot only inspects: it does not operate switchgear, issue permits or isolate plant. Operators choose when missions run, can pause or recall the robot, and decide what happens with its findings. Start with one site and a defined set of rounds, run robot and manual inspections in parallel for a period, and compare results before extending.

Robotx can help you scope which rounds, sites and data flows are worth testing first.

Questions on this topic

Have a question about your site? Talk to a specialist.

Have New Zealand utilities trialled robots at substations?

Yes, though the published example is not recent. In 2018 Transpower ran a month-long pilot at Albany Substation with two tracked robots developed with Massey University, carrying cameras, microphones and thermal imaging. Since then, most published New Zealand examples involve drones on lines and port assets. Overseas utilities have piloted legged robots at substations.

Can a legged robot replace manual substation inspections?

Not entirely. A robot can repeat routine visual, thermal, gauge and acoustic rounds consistently and more often, but people still interpret unusual findings, carry out switching and maintenance, and make operational decisions. Utilities that have published their trials describe robots as a way to change the mix of site visits, not to remove people from the site.

How does the Health and Safety at Work Act apply to an inspection robot?

The robot is plant, and the asset owner's duties stay in place. HSWA requires a business to eliminate risks so far as is reasonably practicable, and to minimise them if it cannot. A robot that removes a person from an energised yard or a confined space can support that, but it brings its own risks, which belong in your risk assessment. Engage the workers affected before you start.

Can quadruped robots work in hazardous areas?

It depends what hazardous means. Near high-voltage equipment, a robot can follow routes set within your network's safe distance rules. In classified explosive atmospheres, equipment must be certified for the zone. At least one legged robot has IECEx and ATEX certification for Zone 1, but most general-purpose quadrupeds do not, so confirm certification first.

Will a robot cope with New Zealand weather?

Check before you commit. Compare the IP rating and operating temperature range of the robot, its payloads and its dock against your wettest, windiest and coldest sites. Driving rain, salt spray at coastal sites, and frost or snow at inland sites are the usual tests. Transpower reported testing its 2018 substation robots in rain, hail and snow.

What does it cost to start robotic inspection at a substation?

Cost depends on the platform, sensor payloads, number of sites, connectivity work and integration with your asset systems. We start with a site assessment of the rounds, routes and data you need, and then provide a written proposal. Many asset owners begin with one site and a small set of defined rounds.

Tell us where your operation loses time.

A Robotx consultation starts with your sites, tasks and constraints. We’ll tell you where robotics fits and where it doesn’t, and what a sensible first deployment would look like.